Prince Harry's Security Appeal: Court Hears Arguments on 'Unique' Royal Circumstances

Prince Harry's legal battle for enhanced security in the UK has reached a crucial stage, with the Court of Appeal hearing arguments about the "unique" circumstances surrounding his decision to step back from royal duties. The Duke of Sussex is appealing a previous ruling that downgraded his police protection when he visits the UK, arguing that his safety and that of his family are at risk.

Key Points from the Hearing:

• "Unique Set of Circumstances": Government barrister Sir James Eadie KC argued that Harry's decision to relinquish his role as a working royal justified a flexible approach to his security arrangements.
• Royal Prerogative: The court was told that the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec), responsible for security decisions, operates under "royal prerogative" rather than strict legal requirements.
• Expertise of Decision-Makers: Sir James emphasized the experience and expertise of Sir Richard Mottram, the chair of Ravec, in overseeing national security matters.
• Flexibility vs. Rigidity: The government argued that Ravec's guidelines were designed to be flexible, allowing for nuanced judgments in unusual cases like Prince Harry's.
• Risk Assessment: The court heard that the decision on Prince Harry's security was carefully considered, with the possibility of future risk assessments not ruled out.
• "Manifestly Inferior" Security: Shaheed Fatima KC, representing Prince Harry, argued that the duke was subjected to a "bespoke process" that was "manifestly inferior" to what he previously received.
• Safety at Stake: Ms. Fatima emphasized the real threat to Prince Harry's safety and security, highlighting his presence at the hearing as evidence of the importance of the appeal to him and his family.

Prince Harry was present in court for the second day of the hearing, listening attentively to the arguments. The details of his current security arrangements and desired levels were not discussed publicly due to security concerns.

The Home Office, legally responsible for Ravec's decisions, is opposing the appeal. The court is expected to issue a written decision at a later date. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Prince Harry's future visits to the UK and the security arrangements for other high-profile individuals.