Prince Harry Claims "Inferior Treatment" in UK Security Battle

Prince Harry is in court appealing the decision to alter his security arrangements after stepping down as a senior royal in 2020. His legal team argues he's been unfairly "singled out" for "inferior treatment." Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

The Core of the Dispute Harry's taxpayer-funded security was modified after he ceased being a working royal. He is contesting that change, arguing that his visits to the UK are now rare due to the downgraded security, despite facing ongoing significant security threats. Currently, his security is assessed on a case-by-case basis, similar to other high-profile visitors, but he argues this is insufficient and unjust.

Legal Arguments His barrister, Shaheed Fatima KC, asserts that the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) didn't follow standard procedures in his case. She claims there was no formal meeting or official notes taken regarding his security arrangements. Fatima argues that Harry didn't have access to crucial details about how decisions were made concerning his security, preventing him from presenting his case effectively. The legal team also contends that the previous judge did not properly evaluate the evidence.

Home Office Response The Home Office defends its position, arguing they have treated Prince Harry in a "bespoke manner," considering his specific circumstances. They claim he is no longer part of the cohort whose security is regularly reviewed but is brought back into consideration when appropriate. Barrister Sir James Eadie KC suggests Harry is relying on an overly formal interpretation of RAVEC's process.

Harry's Perspective Prince Harry has previously stated that his family's safety is paramount. He wants his children to feel at home in the UK but believes that's impossible without adequate security. He has cited previous incidents, including threats from al-Qaeda and a paparazzi chase in New York, as evidence of ongoing risks.

What's Next? The two-day hearing includes a session held partially in secret to protect sensitive security information. A written judgment will be issued at a later date. The outcome of this appeal could significantly impact Prince Harry's future visits to the UK and the security arrangements for other high-profile individuals.